Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Appearance Potentials and Apparent Heats of Formation of the Methylene and Difluoromethylene Ions

Abstract

IN an earlier communication1 we made use of the appearance potentials of the fluorobenzene ions from some trifluoromethyl benzenes to obtain an estimate of the heat of formation of the difluoromethylene radical eliminated in these electron impact processes. This work gave values of about − 20 kcal mol−1 as the upper (most positive) limits for the heat of formation of the radical, compared with estimates of about −35 kcal mol−1 given by other workers2,3. If the latter estimates are the more correct, it would seem that the difluoromethylene radicals are eliminated in these impact processes with excess energy. Such behaviour is not unlikely in view of the demonstration that carbon monoxide is eliminated from benzalde-hyde by an electron impact process that involves excess energy (of about 3 eV)3. In an attempt to discover more about the thermochemistry of this radical, an investigation has been made of the appearance potentials of the difluoromethylene and ethylene ions. The measured appearance potentials (A.P.) and the derived apparent heats of formation of the ions, calculated using equations of the form: ΔHf(CX2+) = A(CX2+) − ΔHf(fragment) + ΔHf(molecule) are given in Table 1. The apparent heats of formation derived from the methanes were calculated on the assumption that the other products of the impact processes were diatomic molecules. The other products of the impact processes involving ethylenes were assumed to be methylene radicals. If the impact processes involving the methanes had been assumed to produce atoms as the other fragments, then much smaller values of the apparent heats of formation would have resulted. In particular, the values for CF2+ and CH2+ would be about 160 kcal mol−1 and 245 kcal mol−1 from CF2HCl and CH3Cl, respectively. The assumption that these are the values associated with the minimum of excess energy would lead to greater thermochemical inconsistencies than do those we have chosen. The lowest values for the apparent heats of formation of the methylene ion are those derived from the methanes and are represented by the value 339 ± 2 kcal mol−1. Although it is uncertain that this value includes no excess energy, we can be sure that the larger value found for the case of ethylene does include about 30 kcal or more excess energy. The value derived from CH2=CF2 will contain as little excess energy as the minimum derived from the methanes if the heat of formation of the difluoromethylene radical is –20 kcal mol−1, but more if the heat of formation of this radicalis more negative, as is favoured by some workers. The spectroscopic value of the ionization potential of methylene is 10.35 eV (ref. 7). It follows from this and the heat of formation of the ion that the heat of formation of the methylene radical is equal to or less than 100 kcal mol−1. This limit includes all the proposed values4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Majer, J. R., and Patrick, C. R., Nature, 192, 866 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Margrave, J. L., Nature, 197, 376 (1962), and earlier papers.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Majer, J. R., and Patrick, C. R., Trans. Farad. Soc., 59, 1274 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cottrell, J. L., The Strengths of Chemical Bonds, second ed. (Butterworths, London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reed, R. I., and Snedden, W., Trans. Farad. Soc., 54, 301 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Margrave, J. L., J. Chem. Phys., 31, 1432 (1959).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Patrick, C. R., Advances in Fluorine Chemistry, 2, 1 (Butterworths, London, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nat. Bur. Stand. Circ. 500 (1951).

  9. Wicke, E., Angew. Chem., 60, 65 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reed, R. I., and Snedden, W., Trans. Farad. Soc., 55, 876 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lifshitz, L., and Long, F. A., paper presented before A. S. T. M. Comm. on Mass Spectrometry, New Orleans, June 1961 (private communication).

  12. Majer, J. R., Patrick, C. R., and Robb, J. C., Trans. Farad. Soc., 57, 14 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren, J. W., and Craggs, J. D., Mass Spectrometry, 36 (Institute of Petroleum, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, W. C., Bralsford, R., and Roessler, D. M., Spectroscopy, edit. by Wells, M. J., 279 (Institute of Petroleum, London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MAJER, J., PATRICK, C. Appearance Potentials and Apparent Heats of Formation of the Methylene and Difluoromethylene Ions. Nature 201, 1022–1023 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1038/2011022a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2011022a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing