Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Comparison of Plant Cell Division Inducers from Coconut Milk and Apple Fruitlets

Abstract

COCONUT milk is recognized as a rich source of plant cell division inducers, which have become known as kinins1–5. Recently, apple fruitlets were also shown to be a rich source6, and the kinins have been extracted from this tissue and concentrated7. The results showed that the extract contains at least four and probably five independently active kinins as revealed by the tobacco stem pith test8. In this test, blocks of tobacco pith are cultured singly in small tubes on a sucrose–mineral salt medium which also contains the auxin, indolyl-3-acetic acid. An ‘active’ extract, added as a supplement to this medium, induces cell division and the formation of microscopically visible clusters of new cells after 14 days. In control cultures the cells enlarge but do not divide. Reduced nitrogen compounds and hexitols are not required in this assay, nor do they enhance the effect of active extracts as they do in the carrot root phloem test9, which has been used in many studies on coconut milk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strong, F. M., Topics in Microbial Chemistry (John Wiley and Sons, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The word kinin has also been used for polypeptides which are physiologically active in animal tissues. See, for example, Lewis, G. P., Physiol. Revs., 40, 647 (1960). The plant kinins are unrelated to these substances.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Caplin, S. M., and Steward, F. C., Science, 108, 655 (1948).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Steward, F. C., and Shantz, E. M., Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol., 10, 397 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauney, J. R., Hillman, W. S., Miller, C. O., Skoog, F., Clayton, R. A., and Strong, F. M., Physiol. Plant., 5, 485 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldacre, P. L., and Bottomley, W., Nature, 184, 555 (1959).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zwar, J. A., Bottomley, W., and Kefford, N. P., Austral. J. Biol. Sci., 16, 407 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bottomley, W., Kefford, N. P., Zwar, J. A., and Goldacre, P. L., Austral. J. Biol. Sci., 16, 395 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pollard, J. K., Shantz, E., and Steward, F. C., Plant Physiol., 36, 492 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ZWAR, J., KEFFORD, N., BOTTOMLEY, W. et al. A Comparison of Plant Cell Division Inducers from Coconut Milk and Apple Fruitlets. Nature 200, 679–680 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/200679a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/200679a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing