Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Fixation for Electron Microscopy

Abstract

IT is a common practice to use buffers for making up fixing solutions for study of biological materials by electron microscopy, and such buffered fixatives are considered advantageous. This belief seems to have resulted from researches in days when the development of preparative techniques was in its infancy; and embedding media, like epoxy resins and polyester resins, were unknown in electron microscopy. It was experienced1 that fixation by simple distilled water solutions of osmium tetroxide followed by embedding in monomer methacrylates caused gross vacuolization of the ground cytoplasm, which resulted in disorganization of the cellular membranous system; the nucleoplasm also precipitated into a coarse reticulum. Further experiments suggested that these defects in preservation were caused by a wave of acidity produced by the reaction of osmium tetroxide with tissues; this acidity preceded fixation of tissues by osmium tetroxide. It was, however, discovered by Palade1 that preservation of cell structures was greatly improved if the fixative were buffered (pH. 7.3–7.5); and he recommended the use of Michaelis's2 sodium acetate/ sodium veronal buffer for this purpose. This buffer seems to have been more often used than any other for making up solutions of osmium tetroxide. It has also been adopted for buffering potassium permanganate3 and formaldehyde for use in electron microscopy, though formaldehyde reacts with veronal to produce a substance that has no buffering value in the range of pH. of physiological importance (7.2–7.5)4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Palade, G. E., J. Exp. Med., 95, 285 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Michaelis, L., Biochem. Z., 234, 139 (1931).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Luft, J. H., J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 2, 799 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holt, S. J., and Hicks, R. M., Nature, 191, 832 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Michaelis, L., J. Biol. Chem., 87, 33 (1930).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker, J. R., Cytological Technique (Methuen, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Malhotra, S. K., Quart. J. Micro. Sci. (in the press).

  8. Malhotra, S. K., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 103, 287 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malhotra, S. K., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 103, 5 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Malhotra, S. K., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 104, 117 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nichols, D., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 100, 539 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luft, J. H., J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 9, 409 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MALHOTRA, S. Fixation for Electron Microscopy. Nature 198, 611–612 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1038/198611a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/198611a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing