Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Physical Significance of Michaelis Constants

Abstract

Briggs and Haldane1 showed that for the reaction sequence E + S ESE + P, the same form of initial rate equation is obtained by the steady-state assumption as by the more restrictive equilibrium assumption of Michaelis and Menten2. It was evident, therefore, that the Michaelis constant, Km, defined3 as the substrate concentration with which half the maximum rate is attained, is not necessarily equal to the substrate constant, Ks, the dissociation constant of the enzyme–substrate complex. Nevertheless, it is still sometimes assumed4,5 that the Michaelis constant is a measure of the affinity of the substrate for the enzyme. In a recent text-book6, it is stated that the Michaelis constant must be either equal to or greater than the substrate constant. It seems worth while to point out that this is not so, and to indicate relationships between Km and Ks values derived from reaction schemes for reversible reactions involving one and two substrates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Briggs, G. E., and Haldane, J. B. S., Biochem. J., 19, 338 (1925).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Michaelis, L., and Menten, M. L., Biochem. Z., 49, 333 (1913).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rep. Comm. on Enzymes, I.U.B. Symp., 20, 13 (Pergamon Press, 1961).

  4. Talalay, P., and Marcus, P. I., J. Biol. Chem., 218, 675 (1956).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mapson, L. W., and Burton, W. G., Biochem. J., 82, 19 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielands, J. B., and Stumpf, P. K., Outlines of Enzyme Chemistry, 72 (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reiner, J. M., Behaviour of Enzyme Systems, 32 (Burgess Publishing Co., Minneapolis, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gutfreund, H., Endeavour, 16, 217 (1957).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon, M., and Webb, E. C., Enzymes, 111 (Longmans, Green and Co., London, 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Theorell, H., and Chance, B., Acta Chem. Scand. 5, 1127 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alberty, R. A., J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 75, 1928 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalziel, K., Acta Chem. Scand., 11, 1706 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dalziel, K., Biochem. J., 84, 244 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Theorell, H., and McKinley-McKee, J. S., Acta Chem. Scand., 15, 1811 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dalziel, K., Biochem. J., 83, 28, P (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dalziel, K., Biochem. J., 84, 69, P (1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DALZIEL, K. Physical Significance of Michaelis Constants. Nature 196, 1203–1205 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1038/1961203b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1961203b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing