Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparison of Short-Circuit Current and Net Water Movement in Single Perfused Proximal Tubules of Rat Kidneys

Abstract

THE major portion of renal salt and water reabsorption occurs within the proximal convoluted tubule, amounting in mammalian kidneys to about 80 per cent of the quantities present in the glomerular nitrate. Based on indirect evidence, proximal sodium transport has been postulated to be active. Recently, however, results obtained in stop-flow experiments were interpreted in such a way as to indicate passive bulk movement of tubular fluid as the predominant mode of proximal tubular salt transfer. Micropuncture work on rats has demonstrated unequivocally the existence of active sodium transport across proximal epithelium1, but did not provide information as to the relative contribution of active sodium transport to the overall net movement of this ion species. The present work represents an attempt to clarify this point by correlating active transport of ions as measured by the short-circuit method with measurements of net movement of water under comparable conditions. Assuming that proximal fluid reabsorption is isosmotic—an assumption in agreement with all known measurements of osmotic pressure of proximal tubular fluid—net water movement can be used as an index of net transport of sodium. Thus short-circuit current can be correlated with net movement of sodium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Windhager, E. E., and Giebisch, G., Amer. J. Physiol., 200, 581 (1961).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ussing, H. H., and Zerahn, K., Acta physiol. Scand., 223, 110 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coombs, J. S., Eccles, J. C., and Fatt, P., J. Physiol. (Lond.) 130, 291 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karger, W., Eigler, F. W., and Hampel, A., Pfluegers Arch. ges. Physiol., 272, 187 (1960).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hodgkin, A. L., and Rushton, W. A. H., Proc. Roy. Soc., B, 133, 444 (1946).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Windhager, E. E., Whittembury, G., Oken, D. E., Schatzmann, H. J., and Solomon, A. K., Amer. J. Physiol., 197, 313 (1959).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WINDHAGER, E., GIEBISCH, G. Comparison of Short-Circuit Current and Net Water Movement in Single Perfused Proximal Tubules of Rat Kidneys. Nature 191, 1205–1207 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1038/1911205a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/1911205a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing