Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Adaptation of a Photometer for the Direct Recording of Column Chromatograms

Abstract

THE direct recording of chromatograms presents several advantages: it saves time and labour and eliminates all errors inherent in a fraction collector. To actuate the recorder, a suitable method of detecting the eluting bands must be used. Out of several possibilities, absorption of light, especially ultraviolet light, seems the most generally useful, since many laboratories are equipped with a photometer. Although such devices are already mentioned in the literature1,2, a detailed description seems to be lacking. The only drawback of such a method lies in the rather short expectancy of life of the hydrogen lamp used as source of ultra-violet light. This limits the application of the direct photometric recording method to chromatography of short duration (a few hours). Only the most difficult separations need, however, days or weeks, and most column elution methods can be speeded up by adequate pressure without excessive diminution in efficiency. Such a photometric direct recording device for column chromatograms was set up in our laboratory and Fig. 1 shows a typical result of a chromatography terminated in less than 2 hr., which would have taken much longer using the earlier methods (fraction collector—measuring each fraction—plotting the result and calculating).

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grant, R. A., J. App. Chem., 8, 136 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Spetsig, L. O., Steniger, Maj., and Brohult, S., European Brewery Convention, Copenhagen, 22 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Verzele, M., Bull. Soc. Chim. Belge, No. 64, 71 (1955).

  4. Verzele, M., wallerstein Laboratories Comm., 29, 337 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VERZELE, M. Adaptation of a Photometer for the Direct Recording of Column Chromatograms. Nature 183, 604–605 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1038/183604a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/183604a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing