Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparison of Interphase and Prophase in Isolated Rat Liver Nuclei

Abstract

IT has often been found that isolated interphase nuclei can be made granular or homogeneous artificially by alteration of the composition of the medium in which they are suspended1–3; and there is an obvious possibility that this is related to the condensed and decondensed states of chromosomes in prophase and interphase respectively, that is, that the change from interphase to prophase is merely a ‘granulation’ produced by a change in physical properties of the cell sap. The only apparent difference is that artificial granularity in isolated interphase nuclei is of finer texture, that is, the granules are smaller and probably more numerous (though difficult to count) than the chromosomes in natural prophase. A simple explanation of the difference in texture could be based on analogy with crystallization, for example, of proteins, where in some cases fine texture results from too rapid change in the medium. We therefore tried to ‘crystallize’ chromosomes in isolated interphase nuclei by changing the medium continuously over periods up to a few hours, by dialysis or by drop-wise additions with gentle stirring.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ris, H., and Mirsky, A. E., J. Gen. Physiol., 32, 489 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, N. G., and Wilbur, K. M., J. Gen. Physiol., 35, 781 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Philpot, J. St. L., and Stanier, J. E., Biochem. J., 63, 214 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Higgins, G. M., and Anderson, R. M., Arch. Path. Lab. Med., 12, 186 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frazer, S. C., and Davidson, J. N., Exp. Cell. Res., 4, 316 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mirsky, A. E., and Ris, H., J. Gen. Physiol., 34, 475 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dounce, A. L., and Monty, K. J., J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 1, 155 (1955)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PHILPOT, J., STANIER, J. Comparison of Interphase and Prophase in Isolated Rat Liver Nuclei. Nature 179, 102–103 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1038/179102b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/179102b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing