Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Cytoreduction Regimens

Activity of single-agent melphalan 220–300 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma

Summary:

High-dose chemotherapy using melphalan (HDMEL) is an important component of many conditioning regimens that are given before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). In contrast to the situation in myeloma, and to a lesser degree acute leukemia, only a very limited published experience exists with the use of HDMEL conditioning as a single agent in doses requiring AHSCT for lymphoma, both Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and especially non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Thus, we report results of treating 26 lymphoma patients (22 with NHL and four with HL) with HDMEL 220–300 mg/m2 plus amifostine (AF) cytoprotection and AHSCT as part of a phase I–II trial. Median age was 51 years (range 24–62 years); NHL histology was varied, but was aggressive (including transformed from indolent) in 19 patients, indolent in two patients and mantle cell in one. All 26 patients had been extensively treated; 11 were refractory to the immediate prior therapy on protocol entry and two had undergone prior AHSCT. All were deemed ineligible for other, ‘first-line’ AHSCT regimens. Of these 26 patients, 22 survived to initial tumor evaluation on D +100. At this time, 13 were in complete remission, including four patients who were in second CR before HDMEL+AF+AHSCT. Responses occurred at all HDMEL doses. Currently, seven patients are alive, including five without progression, with a median follow-up in these latter patients of D +1163 (range D +824 to D +1630); one of these patients had a nonmyeloablative allograft as consolidation on D +106. Conversely, 14 patients relapsed or progressed, including five who had previously achieved CR with the AHSCT procedure. Two patients, both with HL, remain alive after progression; one is in CR following salvage radiotherapy. Six patients died due to nonrelapse causes, including two NHL patients who died while in CR. We conclude that HDMEL+AF+AHSCT has significant single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory NHL and HL. This experience may be used as a starting point for subsequent dose escalation of HDMEL (probably with AF) in established combination regimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mink SA, Armitage JO . High-dose therapy in lymphomas: a review of the current status of allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Oncologist 2001; 6: 247–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shipp MA, Abeloff MD, Antman KH et al. International consensus conference on high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: report of the jury. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 423–429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hahn T, Wolff SN, Czuczman M et al. ASBMT Expert Panel. The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of diffuse large cell B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: an evidence based review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7: 308–331.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunault-Berger M, Ifrah N, Solal-Celigny P, Groupe Ouest-Est des Leucemies Aiguee et des Maladies du Sang. Intensive therapies in follicular non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood 2002; 100: 1141–1152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Reece DE . Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Hodgkin's disease. Curr Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 165–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mounier N, Gisselbrecht C . Conditioning regimens before transplantation in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol 1998; 9 (Suppl. 1): S15–S21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salar A, Sierra J, Gandarillas M et al., for the GEL/TAMO Spanish Cooperative Group. Autologous stem cell transplantation for clinically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the role of preparative regimens. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 405–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sureda A, Arranz R, Iriondo A et al., Grupo Espanol de Linfomas/Transplante Autologo de Medula Osea Spanish Cooperative Group. Autologous stem-cell transplantation for Hodgkin's disease: results and prognostic factors in 494 patients from the Grupo Espanol de Linfomas/Transplante Autologo de Medula Osea Spanish Cooperative Group. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 1395–1404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mills W, Chopra R, McMillan A et al. BEAM chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 588–595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams CD, Goldstone AH, Pearce RM et al. Purging of bone marrow in autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case-matched comparison with unpurged cases by the European Blood and Marrow Transplant Lymphoma Registry. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 2454–2464.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Demirkazik A, Kessinger A, Armitage JO et al. Progenitor and lymphoma cells in blood stem cell harvests: impact on survival following transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 207–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Samuels BL, Bitran JD . High-dose intravenous melphalan: a review. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13: 1786–1799.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazarus HM, Herzig RH, Graham-Pole J et al. Intensive melphalan chemotherapy and cryopreserved autologous bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of refractory cancer. J Clin Oncol 1983; 1: 359–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moreau P, Milpied N, Mahe B et al. Melphalan 220 mg/m2 followed by peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in 27 patients with advanced multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1003–1006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singhal S, Powles R, Treleaven J et al. Melphalan alone prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical sibling donors for hematologic malignancies: alloengraftment with potential preservation of fertility in women. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 18: 1049–1055.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Millar JL, McElwain TJ, Clutterbuck RD, Wist EA . The modification of melphalan toxicity in tumor bearing mice by s-2-(3-aminoprophylamino)-ethylphosphorothioic acid (WR2721). Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5: 321–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Capelli D, Santini G, De Souza C et al. Amifostine can reduce mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning for peripheral blood progenitor cell autotransplant: a retrospective study. Br J Haematol 2000; 110: 300–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Capizzi RL . The preclinical basis for broad-spectrum selective cytoprotection of normal tissues from cytotoxic therapies by amifostine. Semin Oncol 1999; 26 (Suppl. 7): 3–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw LM, Bonner H, Lieberman R . Pharmacokinetic profile of amifostine. Semin Oncol 1996; 23 (Suppl. 8): 18–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuittinen O, Ruokolainen H, Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T . Amifostine does not protect malignant lymphoma cell lines from the cytotoxic effects of various chemotherapeutics in vitro. Leukemia Lymphoma 2001; 42: 507–510.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Phillips GL, Adams VR, Badros A et al. Amifostine and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support of escalating-dose melphalan: a phase I study. (submitted for publication) 2003.

  22. Reece DE, Vesole D, Flomenberg N et al. Intensive therapy with high-dose melphalan (MEL) 280 mg/m2 plus amifostine cytoprotection and ASCT as part of initial therapy in patients with multiple myeloma [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Hematol 2002; 100: 432a.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harris HL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J et al. The World Health Organization classification of neoplasms of the hematologic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting – Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Hematol J 2000; 1: 53–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Philip T, Armitage JO, Spitzer G et al. High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation after failure of conventional chemotherapy in adults with intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1493–1498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al. Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Back A et al. Regimen-related toxicity and early posttransplant survival in patients undergoing marrow transplantation for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1288–1294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Stockerl-Goldstein KE, Reddy SA, Horning SF et al. Favorable treatment outcome in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with ‘poor’ mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6: 506–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher RI . Overview of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: biology, staging, and treatment. Semin Oncol 2003; 30 (Suppl. 4): 3–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moreau P, Facon T, Attal M et al. for the Intergroupe Francophone du Muelome. Comparison of 200 mg/m2 melphalan and 8 Gy total body irradiation plus 140 mg/m2 melphalan as conditioning regimens for peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: final analysis of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome 9502 randomized trial. Blood 2002; 3: 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stewart DA, Guo D, Sutherland JA et al. Single-agent high-dose melphalan salvage therapy for Hodgkin's disease: cost, safety, and long-term efficacy. Ann Oncol 1997; 8: 1277–1279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bergsagel PL . Chemotherapy of multiple myeloma: melphalan – 40 years old and still going strong. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003; 9: 2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Cesaro S, Meloni G, Messina C et al. Italian Pediatric Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. High-dose melphalan with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia: results of a retrospective analysis of the Italian Pediatric Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 131–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chopra R, Linch DC, McMillan AK et al. Mini-BEAM followed by BEAM and ABMT for very poor risk Hodgkin's disease. Br J Haematol 1992; 81: 197–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Russell JA, Selby PJ, Ruether BA et al. Treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease with high dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1989; 4: 425–429.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Adams V, Phillips GL, Hale G et al. Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of escalating doses of melphalan (MEL) given with amifositine (AMI) cytoprotection (CP) in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT): a Phase I-II study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2000; 920a.

  37. Buschini A, Anceschi E, Carlo-Stella C et al. Amifostine (WR-2721) selective protection against melphalan genotoxicity. Leukemia 2000; 14: 1642–1651.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Douay L, Hu C, Giaratana MC et al. Amifostine improves the antileukemic therapeutic index of mafosfamide: implications for bone marrow purging. Blood 1995; 86: 2849–2855.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. List AF, Gerner EW . Amifostine: a tonic of toxin to myeloid progenitors. Leukemia Res 2001; 24: 1009–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Capelli D, Santini G, De Souza C et al. Amifostine can reduce mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning for peripheral blood progenitor cell autotransplant: a retrospective study. Br J Haematol 2000; 110: 300–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chauncey TR, Gooley TA, Lloid ME et al. Pilot trial of cytoprotection with amifostine given with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Am J Clin Oncol 2000; 23: 406–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Cronin S, Uberti JP, Ayash LJ et al. Use of amifostine as a chemoprotectant during high-dose chemotherapy in autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 1247–1249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Renner S, Krumpelmann S, Bruchelt G et al. Effect of amifostine on neuroblastoma during high dose chemotherapy: in vivo and in vitro investigations. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 4531–4538.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hartmann JT, von Vangerow A, Fels LM et al. A randomized trial of amifostine in patients with high-dose VIC chemotherapy plus autologous blood stem cell transplantation. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 313–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Thieblemont C, Dumontet C, Saad H et al. Amifostine reduces mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 769–775.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jantunen E, Kuittien T, Nousiaien T . A pilot study on feasibility and efficacy of amifostine preceding high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell support in myeloma patients. Leukemia Lymphoma 2002; 43: 1961–1965.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wun T, Kwon DS, Tuscano JM . Radioimmunotherapy: potential as a therapeutic strategy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. BioDrugs 2001; 15: 151–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Press OW, Eary JF, Gooley T et al. A phase I/II trial of iodine-131-tositumomab (anti-CD20), etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and autologous stem cell transplantation for relapsed B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2000; 96: 2934–2942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our patients for their willingness to undergo clinical research studies; our nursing colleagues for their excellent patient care; our medical consultants for their valuable assistance; our data coordinators, and Ms M Coddington, Ms Lynn Stull and Ms Linda Wilkinson for their expert help with manuscript preparation. Finally, we thank Dr J Friedberg for his helpful suggestions with the manuscript. Grant support for this study was provided by the NIH, RO3CA80666 and ALZA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G L Phillips.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, G., Meisenberg, B., Reece, D. et al. Activity of single-agent melphalan 220–300 mg/m2 with amifostine cytoprotection and autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 33, 781–787 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704424

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links