Abstract
THE skeleton of the hyoid arch of Batoidei has been for many years the subject of discussion by morphologists. Gegenbaur1 considered the hyoid elements bearing hyal rays and lying posterior to the hyomandibular cartilage to represent the ceratohyal of Selachoidei, which became disconnected from the ventral edge of the hyomandibular and extended upwards behind it. Krivetski2 and de Beer3 considered these hyoid elements as pseudohyoid and formed by the fusion of the proximal ends of the hyal rays. Such a phenomenon occurred during the phylogenetic divergence between Batoidei and Selachoidei, and was largely associated with the increased distance between the mouth and first gill slit in Batoidei. Thus the pseudohyoid elements were necessary for providing a support for the hyal rays, as well as the anterior wall of the first gill slit. During the enlargement and extension of these pseudohyoid elements, the original ceratohyal in Batoidei has disappeared.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Gegenbaur, C., “Das Kopfskelet der Selachier” (Leipzig, 1872).
Krivetski, A., Rev. Zool. Russe, 2 (1917).
de Beer, G. R., Quart. J. Micro. Sci., 75 (1932).
Bridge, J. W., “Cambridge Nat. Hist.” (Fishes), 7 (London, 1904).
Regan, C. T., Proc. Zool. Soc. (London, 1906).
Goodrich, E. S., “A Treatise on Zoology” (London, 1909).
Melouk, M. A., Pub. Mar. Biol. Station, Ghardaqa, 7 (1949).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HAMDY, A. Hyoid Arch of Rhinobatidæ. Nature 170, 166 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1038/170166a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/170166a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.