Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Genetical Differences in Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiourea and to Anti-thyroid Substances

Abstract

FOX1 first observed that people differed in their ability to taste phenylthiourea, and it was found (Blakeslee and Salmon2, Blakeslee3, Snyder4,5) that these differences were genetically determined. The distribution of taste thresholds to this substance in all populations so far studied has been found to be bimodal. Familial investigations indicate that the two classes of individuals, tasters and non-tasters, that is, those relatively sensitive and those relatively insensitive to phenylthiourea, differ in respect of a single gene pair, the tasters being homozygous or heterozygous for the dominant allele, the non-tasters homozygous for the recessive allele. Between one quarter and one third of all individuals tested in various populations appear to fall into the recessive class. Fisher, Huxley and Ford6 have described observations which suggest that similar differences may exist among anthropoid apes. They have pointed out that this implies the existence of a stable, balanced polymorphism, and that, for such a system to occur, the heterozygotes should have had some selective advantage over the two types of homozygotes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fox, A. L., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sri., 18, 115 (1932).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blakeslee, A. F., and Salmon, M. R., Eug. News, 16, 105 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blakeslee, A. F., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 18, 120 (1932).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Snyder, L. H., Science, 74, 151 (1931).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder, L. H., Ohio J. Sci., 32, 436 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, R. A., Ford, E. B., and Huxley, J., Nature, 144, 750 (1939).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Salmon, T. N., and Blakeslee, A. F., Proc. U.S. Nat. Acad. Sci., 21, 78 (1935).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Falconer, D. S., Ann. Eug., 13, 211 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. v. Skramlik, E., Jena Z. Med. Nat., 76, 50 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snyder, L. H., and Davidson, D. F., Eug. News, 22, 1 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Riddell, W. J. B., and Wybar, K. C., Nature, 154, 669 (1944).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopkins, C. Y., Canad. J. Res., B, 16, 341 (1938); 20, 268 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chesney, A. M., Clawson, T. A., and Webster, B., Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 43, 261 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Webster, B., and Chesney, A. M., Amer. J. Path., 6, 275 (1930)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Astwood, E. B., Bissel, A., and Hughes, A. M., Endocrinology, 37, 456 (1945).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HARRIS, H., KALMUS, H. Genetical Differences in Taste Sensitivity to Phenylthiourea and to Anti-thyroid Substances. Nature 163, 878–879 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1038/163878b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/163878b0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing