Article | Published:

The Ronald Ross Jubilee

Nature volume 162, pages 5051 (10 July 1948) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

ANNIVERSARIES and celebrations of medical discoveries have little except historical interest unless they have some direct bearing on present problems. In the case of malaria they have. Fifty years ago, medical men and sanitarians were given a new tool in the form of knowledge of the means of transmission of malaria from man to man. This Was heralded as the immediate forerunner of a recession of malaria throughout the world. Forty years experience left these hopes unfulfilled, the new knowledge being applied on a relatively small scale and mainly to highly specialized communities such as towns, labour forces and armies, which are, of course, unrepresentative of the mass of rural tropical peoples. The last ten years work, which is now being brought together and appreciated, shows that there is no longer any reason why the original aim should not be rapidly achieved if the importance, and the limitations, of recent discoveries are fully realized by medical men, administrators, and others concerned in the health of the tropics. A restatement of past history, an emphasis on the lessons to be learnt from it, and a summary of present knowledge based on an appropriate occasion such as the fiftieth anniversary of Ronald Ross‘s discovery is therefore considerably more than a sentimental occasion. The Ross Institute of Tropical Hygiene, which is amalgamated with the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, has attempted this survey and assessment in the form of an exhibition open to the public throughout the past week.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , Bull. Acad. Med., Paris (Nov. 23, 1880).

  2. 2.

    , and , "On Summer–Autumn Malarial Fevers" (London: The New Sydenham Society, 1894).

  3. 3.

    , Trans. Linn. Soc. (Zoology), 14, 304 (1878).

  4. 4.

    , Brit. Med. J. (Dec. 8, 1894).

  5. 5.

    , Brit. Med. J. (Dec. 18, 1897).

  6. 6.

    , Lancet (Aug. 20, 1898).

  7. 7.

    , J. Trop. Med. (Aug. 1898).

  8. 8.

    , Brit. Med. J. (Sept. 24, 1898).

  9. 9.

    , Brit. Med. J. (Feb. 18, 1899).

  10. 10.

    , , and , Atti. d. Reale Acad. d. Lincei (Jan. 8, 1899).

  11. 11.

    , Brit. Med. J. (Sept. 9, 16 and 30 and Oct. 14, 1899).

  12. 12.

    Correspondent, Brit. Med. J. (Dec. 8, 1900).

  13. 13.

    , , Brit. Med. J. (Dec. 8, 1900).

  14. 14.

    , J. Trop. Med. (Nov. 16 and Dec. 1, 1903 and April 1, 1905).

  15. 15.

    , Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Memoir 9 (University Press of Liverpool, 1903).

  16. 16.

    , , Quart. Bull. Health Org., League of Nations, 5, 114.

  17. 17.

    , Quart. Bull. Health Org., League of Nations, 5, 134.

  18. 18.

    , Deut. med. Wochschr., 58, 530.

  19. 19.

    , and , Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. and Hyg., 41, 785.

  20. 20.

    WHO(IC) Expert Committee on Malaria. Report of Second Session. WHO.IC/Mal./25 (June 8, 1948).

  21. 21.

    , , and , , "Anopheles Gambiæ in Brazil, 1930–1940" (The Rockefeller Foundation, New York, 1943).

  22. 22.

    , Bull. Ent. Res., 38, 449.

Download references

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/162050a0

Authors

    Comments

    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.