Abstract
The criticism which I made about Prof. Tolansky's description of the hollow cathode was that it is “concerned too much with complicated and obsolete forms”. I do not fail to appreciate the work which has been done with this light-source in its most important forms, but I criticize the relative amount of space devoted by Prof. Tolansky to obsolete and little-used varieties.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JACKSON, D. Letter. Nature 160, 909–910 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/160909c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/160909c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
