Abstract
I cannot accept Dr. Douglas's view that because one could, but does not, measure the objects with which biology is concerned, one can therefore claim that the domain of biology is metrical. On those lines one could claim music and painting and poetry as sciences. However, our views do not matter, because Eddington himself has settled the question. He claimed to derive the ultimate laws of Nature from the nature of measurement, not from the character of the objects to which measurement was applied, and in his article on the cosmical number, reprinted in his posthumous work “Fundamental Theory”, he proceeded to deduce them from the details of the act of measurement—the necessity for four entities such as the two ends of the measuring scale and those of the rod to be measured, etc. He sought to meet the difficulty of biology not by forcing it into the metrical scheme but by denying that it was science and classifying it with theology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DINGLE, H. Letter. Nature 160, 908–909 (1947). https://doi.org/10.1038/160908b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/160908b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.