Abstract
IN a recent communication1, Dr. Camm has answered Schild's contention2, that Milne's theory of the gravitational interaction of two massive particles in the field of the substratum is not Lorentz invariant and hence either invalid or else dependent on an arbitrary additional principle. Camm has shown that: (1) the consequences of Milne's theory are independent of any particular simultaneity convention, Lorentz-invariant or otherwise; and (2) the choice of such a convention, if Lorentz-invariant, is much more restricted than Schild supposes. While the particular convention, arbitrarily chosen by Schild, is shown to be invalid, Camm gives plausible reasons for adopting the convention, linking the event (t1,P1) at the particle m1 with the event (t2,P2) at the particle m2. A conclusive reason, however, can be given for imposing this condition uniquely, as the following argument shows.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nature, 155, 754 (1945).
Phys. Rev., 66, 340 (1944).
Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 160, 7 (1937).
Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 160, 4 (1937).
Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 159, 178 (1937).
Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 160, 26 (1937).
Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 158, 344 (1937).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WHITROW, G. The Two-body Problem in Milne's Theory of Gravitation. Nature 156, 365–366 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1038/156365c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/156365c0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.