Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Amides, Imides and Peptides

Abstract

DR. JORDAN LLOYD is wrong in her conception of the nomenclature of imides and imines. While organic chemists will agree with her dictum that substances carrying the –NH2 group are amines, those which carry the >NH group are not necessarily imines. Thus, dimethylamine, (CH3)2NH, has such a group, and is still an amine; surely an imine must contain the structure >C=N–, as in the imino-ethers

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nature, 154, 486 (1944).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wurtz, Jahresb., 566 (1854).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DYSON, G. Amides, Imides and Peptides. Nature 154, 735–736 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/154735b0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/154735b0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing