Abstract
IN 1942 I attempted1 to explain what I understand art to be. Since some of my gossips later took me to task because neither beauty nor truth were mentioned, it may be well to point out that beauty is not essential to a work of art, and that truth is an ambiguous word often used to mean accurate representation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NATURE, 149, 603 (1942).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HOPWOOD, A. Science and Art at the Royal Academy, 1944. Nature 153, 643–644 (1944). https://doi.org/10.1038/153643a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/153643a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
