Abstract
THE stimulating article by Dr. Benesch on the utilization of non-protein nitrogenous compounds as protein substitutes which was recently published in NATURE1is a timely contribution to an important subject. At the outset, Dr. Benesch explains that his object in writing the article is to show that ‘the problem has reached a practical stage”. This opinion is, however, by no means shared by all those who have studied the voluminous literature on the subject published (mainly from the Continent) during the past twenty years. In fact the attitude of Krebs, who reviewed the subject exhaustively in 1937, is in many respects diametrically opposed to that of Dr. Benesch. Moreover, it is all too frequently found that the same set of results is accorded entirely opposite interpretations according to the particular outlook of the workers concerned.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
NATURE, 147, 531 (1941).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
OWEN, E., SMITH, J. & WRIGHT, N. Chemical Substitutes for Dietary Protein. Nature 147, 710–711 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1038/147710b0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/147710b0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.