Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Ionization Maximum for Protons

Abstract

IN a recent paper, Holloway and Moore1 have given a curve showing the average specific ionization, as a function of the residual range, for protons in air. On this curve the ionization maximum occurs at 1.9 mm. residual/range, and in the course of the paper the absolute value of the maximum specific ionization is quoted as 2,320 ion pairs per mm. The shape of the ionization/range curve was deduced from earlier measurements of Parkinson, Herb, Bellamy and Hudson2, and the absolute value of the ionization was obtained on the assumption that, in the region of 3 cm. residual range, the mean specific ionization produced by a proton is a quarter of that produced by an α-particle of the same velocity. On this basis Holloway and Moore inferred that the maximum specific ionization is about one third as great for protons as for α-particles in air (6,760 ion pairs per mm.). Now, while there is overwhelming evidence for the correctness of this last assumption (the 1:4 ratio of ionizations for particles of the same velocity, when the ratio of the effective charges is constant at 1:2), it also appears that the conclusions, regarding the position and height of the ionization maximum for protons, to which the subsequent argument leads, run contrary to accepted evidence from other experiments. If this be admitted, then one must clearly assume that the results of Parkinson, Herb, Bellamy and Hudson will not bear the detailed analysis which Holloway and Moore place upon them, when protons of the smallest energy are concerned. It is the object of the present note to point out the contrary evidence referred to above.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holloway and Moore, Phys. Rev., 58, 847 (1940).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Parkinson, Herb, Bellamy and Hudson, Phys. Rev., 52, 75 (1937).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bower, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 34, 450 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Holloway and Livingston, Phys. Rev., 54, 18 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bethe, Phys. Rev., 53, 313 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stetter and Jentschke, Z. Phys., 110, 214 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rogers, F. T., and Rogers, M. M., Phys. Rev., 55, 263 (1939).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chadwick and Goldhaber, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 151, 479 (1935).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chadwick, Feather and Bretscher, Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 163, 366 (1937).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FEATHER, N. Ionization Maximum for Protons. Nature 147, 510–511 (1941). https://doi.org/10.1038/147510a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/147510a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing