Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The Cyclol Hypothesis

Abstract

FIVE sets of experiments have been reported in the past few years which have been claimed to bear on the cyclol hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kellner, NATURE, 140, 193 (1937).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wrinch, NATURE, 137, 411 (1936) et seq. Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 160, 59 (1937), et seq.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins and Taylor, J. Chem. Soc., 495 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pauling and Niemann, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 61, 1860 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergmann and Niemann, Ann. Rev. Biochem., 7, 110 (1938).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer and Hohenemser, NATURE, 141, 1138 (1938).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haurowitz and Astrup, NATURE, 143, 118 (1939).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Holliday, NATURE, 143, 895 (1939).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wrinch, Phil. Mag., 25, 705 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haurowitz, Z. physiol. Chem., 256, 28 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sobotka and Block, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 59, 2606 (1937).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Langmuir, Proc Phys. Soc., 51, 542 (1939).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WRINCH, D. The Cyclol Hypothesis. Nature 145, 669–670 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1038/145669a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/145669a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing