Abstract
IN Plato's City-State, the ruler or-lawgivers were held to be justified in inventing or approving useful or pious lies if the best minds were convinced that the community was incapable of understanding the truth. The State had to decide what was good for the people to know and accept, whether relating to governmental legislation or religious beliefs. The right appreciation of truth was regarded as the prerogative of a select few and, as popular intelligence was not prepared for enlightenment, it was inexpedient to teach the masses anything which would disturb either their social complacency or superstitions. Socrates himself, to whom many of the political principles represented in Plato's “Republic” can be ascribed, was condemned to die because howould not cease to “corrupt the young” by his teaching; and Galileo might have saved himself from imprisonment by ceasing to disturb the traditional teaching of the Church as to the stability of the earth in the centre of the universe.
Science and Politics in the Ancient World
By Prof. Benjamin Farrington. Pp. 244. (London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd., 1939.) 10s. 6d. net.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GREGORY, R. Science and Politics in the Ancient World. Nature 144, 764–766 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1038/144764a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/144764a0