Abstract
ANOMALOUS amounts of disease in supposedly exactly repeated experiments of flag smut of wheat, and previously with covered smut of barley1, were eventually traced to difference in planting method. Under irrigation in Egypt, these cereals are either broadcast on moist land and ploughed in (herati method) or broadcast on dry land, harrowed in with a wooden baulk and irrigated (afir method).
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jones, G. Howard, Bull. Min. Agric., Cairo, No. 142, 13 (1934).
Miller, W. B., and Millikan, C. R., J. Dept. Agric., Victoria, 33, 365 (1934).
Taylor, J. W., and Zehner, M. G., J. Amer. Soc. Agron., 23, 132 (1931).
Noble, R. J., Phytopath., 13, 127 (March 1923).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JONES, G., NASR, A. Control of Four Smut Diseases by Regulation of Planting Method under Irrigation. Nature 142, 917–918 (1938). https://doi.org/10.1038/142917c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/142917c0
This article is cited by
-
Flag smut of wheat
The Botanical Review (1965)
-
Environment and the cereal smuts
The Botanical Review (1948)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
