Abstract
FIIFTY years ago botany, so far as the class-room 1 was concerned, was very much a matter of definitions, just as field botany was concerned almost wholly with the making of a herbarium of local species. The student found himself set to learn a new language dichasial inflorescences, gynandro-phores, campylotropous ovules as though designed to inculcate the advantages of a classical education. This conception survived pretty well to the end of the nineteenth century. Towards the close of the ‘nineties, when examining a school which professed botany, and turning over the notebooks, I found this sentence, evidently taken down by the whole class from dictation, or rather copied from the blackboard, for the spelling would otherwise have offered variants: “Amaryllis fruit a bilocular loculicidal capsule, a diplotegium”. One of my co-examiners breathed his gratitude that he had been introduced to the lady under a happier star and had been learned instead “to sport with Amaryllis in the shade”.
The Living Garden:
or the How and Why of Garden Life. By Dr. E. J. Salisbury. Pp. xi + 338 + 17 plates. (London: G. Bell and Sons, Ltd., 1935.) 10s. 6d.net.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
HALL, A. The Botanist in the Garden. Nature 136, 931–932 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136931a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136931a0