Abstract
THE three previous volumes of these reviews have proved of so much value to biochemists that the form of their continuation is a matter of general interest. In no branch of science is there a greater flood of published work, more need of analysis and a better chance of an unexpected discovery illuminating further progress. The subject is essentially fluid, and reviews under stereotyped headings may easily become sterile. Hence the editors have encouraged the policy of analysis of selected papers chosen on account of their intrinsic importance and significance. It is for the reviewers and the readers of reviews to co-operate, the former by selecting and the latter by suggesting subjects which are ripe for comment.
Annual Review of Biochemistry
Edited by James Murray Luck. Vol. 4. Pp. vii + 639. (Stanford University, Calif.: Annual Review of Biochemistry, Ltd., 1935.) 5 dollars.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A., E. Annual Review of Biochemistry. Nature 136, 532 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136532a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136532a0