Abstract
ENGLAND has been hearing a great deal 1-J about the training of medical practitioners. All through the spring months ran the long drawn examination by a Committee of the House of Lords of the evidence for and against the bill proposing that osteopaths should be accepted as medical men. The bill was withdrawn, and it may be hoped that the lay public accepted that decision with satisfaction, though it is doubtful whether they could follow the arguments of the medical experts who sought to emphasise the essential value of what was given by the orthodox medical curriculum in training the practitioners whom the country requires for its manifold services in matters of public and private health.
Article PDF
References
British Medical Journal, March 12, 1932.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
E., T. The Medical Curriculum in Great Britain: University and Other Qualifications: Training and Examinations. Nature 136, 90–93 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1038/136090a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/136090a0