Abstract
MAY I comment briefly on the review of my book in NATURE of June 9, p. 852, by Prof. Fowler, to whom I am grateful for the view that new theories of this nature should always be welcomed. It is to be hoped that serious consideration of the theory will not be prejudiced by what the non-scientific press may have said about it.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Masson and Dolley, Roy. Soc. Proc., A, 103, 524; 1923.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
TUTIN, J. Atomic Theory. Nature 134, 23–24 (1934). https://doi.org/10.1038/134023b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/134023b0
This article is cited by
-
A Simple Method for Testing Homogeneity of Wood
Nature (1936)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.