Abstract
THE leading article in NATURE of Nov. 22 appears at a critical moment and must be deeply appreciated by everyone who knows anything of the present state of affairs in India, political or academic. It rightly stresses the literary bias of research in India, in answer to which it may be pointed out that, whereas the older universities teach Indian languages, the University of London is the only English university to accept Indian cultural studies for the B.A. degree (Hons. Archæology, Sect. H). It is true that field-work is non-existent in India, and that, therefore, the bulk of the anthropological research carried out must be more or less arid, because it is at second-hand and divorced from the facts. As an outcome of this, we are now faced by the peculiar prospect of listening to a lengthy debate, and of accepting willy-nilly a decision of sorts, upon a subject that is nothing else than a problem in applied anthropology, that is, the organisation of a federal India; and we are forced to do so with the knowledge that the facts are not accessible. Whatever is done must, therefore, be done in the dark. The action taken will be political and not scientific. One would have liked to have heard Huxley's views on such a state of affairs!
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CODRINGTON, K. Administration and Anthropology in India. Nature 126, 919 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1038/126919a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/126919a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.