Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Mathematical Physics

Abstract

THE scope and quality of the two works under review are very different, but they are both concerned with branches of theoretical physics, and attack them rather from the point of view of the pure mathematician. This raises an important question of pedagogy, on which there may be differences of opinion. In introducing the differential calculus, for example, is it best to base it on crude ideas about the tangents of curves, or should we begin with the full machinery of the theory of limits? Most teachers adopt the former course, for the reason that it quickly opens out wide ranges for application, whereas, though the logical introduction may sharpen the student's faculties, he may become so busy suspecting the soundness of all the ordinary mathematical processes that he will never learn why anyone should ever want to differentiate anything.

(1) Foundations of Potential Theory.

Prof. O. D. Kellogg. (Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen mit besonderer Berüeksichtigung der Anwendungsgebiete, herausgegeben von R. Courant, Band 31.) Pp. ix + 384. (Berlin: Julius Springer, 1929.) 19.60 gold marks.

(2) The Electromagnetic Field.

Max Mason Warren Weaver. Pp. xiii + 390. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; London: Cambridge University Press, 1929.) 27s. net.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathematical Physics. Nature 126, 520–521 (1930). https://doi.org/10.1038/126520a0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/126520a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing