Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Paper
  • Published:

Acquired alkylating drug resistance of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line is unaffected by altered levels of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins

Abstract

In a systematic study to elucidate the involvement of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins in alkylating drug resistance of tumor cells, we utilized the A2780(100) line, that was selected by repeated exposure of A2780 cell line (human ovarian carcinoma line) to chlorambucil (CBL). A2780(100) was 5–10-fold more resistant to nitrogen mustards (IC50 of 50–60 μM) and other DNA crosslinking agents, e.g., cisplatin, and also to DNA topoisomerase inhibitor etoposide (ETO) than A2780. CBL (125 μM) induced extensive apoptosis in A2780 associated with mitochondrial damage but not in A2780(100). No significant differences were observed between A2780 and A2780(100) cells in the basal levels, or the enhanced levels in some cases after CBL treatment, of DNA repair proteins involved in repair of alkyl base adducts or in repair of DNA crosslinks or double strand break repair. However, the basal levels of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-xL and Mcl-1 were 4–8-fold higher in A2780(100) than in A2780 neither of which expressed Bcl-2. In contrast, the levels of pro-apoptotic Bax and Bak were 3–5-fold higher in the CBL-treated A2780 but not in A2780(100). ETO (5 μM) induced apoptosis in A2780 without altering the levels of Bax and Bak in these cells. At the same time, neither overexpression of Bcl-xL in A2780, nor its antisense expression in A2780(100), and nor overexpression of Bax in A2780(100), significantly affected drug sensitivity of either line. Our results suggest that a change in an early step in DNA damage processing which affects intracellular signaling, such as enhanced DNA double-strand break repair, could be the primary cause for development of resistance in A2780(100) cells to drugs which induce DNA crosslinks or double strand-breaks.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Apaf:

apoptosis activating factor

CBL:

chlorambucil

cyt c:

cytochrome C

topo II:

DNA topoisomerase II

ETO:

etoposide

mΔψ:

mitochondrial membrane potential

PARP:

poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase

RD123:

rodamine 123

References

  • Adams JM and Cory S . 1998 Science 218: 1322–1326.

  • Begleiter A, Mowat M, Israels LG and Johnston JB . 1996 Leuk Lymph 23: 187–201.

  • Boldogh I, Ramana CV, Chen Z, Biswas T, Hazra T, Grosch S, Grombacher T, Mitra S and Kaina B . 1998 Cancer Res 58: 3950–3956.

  • Bresnahan WA, Boldogh I, Chi P, Thompson A and Albrecht T . 1997 Virology 231: 239–247.

  • Brookman KW, Lamerdin JE, Thelen MP, Hwang M, Reardon JT, Sancar A, Zhou ZQ, Walter CA, Parris CN and Thompson LH . 1996 Mol Cell Biol 16: 6553–6562.

  • Chen Z and Lash LH . 1998 J Pharmacol Exp Therap 285: 608–618.

  • Chen KH, Yakes FM, Srivastava DK, Singhal RK, Sobol RW, Horton JK, Van Houten B and Wilson SH . 1998 Nucleic Acids Res 26: 2001–2007.

  • Colvin OM, Friedman HS, Gamcsik MP, Fenselau C and Hilton J . 1993 Adv Enzyme Reg 3: 19–26.

  • Decaudin D, Geley S, Hirsch T, Castedo M, Marchetti P, Macho A, Kofler R and Kroemer G . 1997 Cancer Res 57: 62–67.

  • Eliopoulos AG, Kerr DJ, Herod J, Hodgkins L, Krajewski S, Reed JC and Young LS . 1995 Oncogene 11: 1217–1228.

  • Gottesman MM and Pastan I . 1993 Annu Rev Biochem 62: 385–427.

  • Green DR and Reed JC . 1998 Science 218: 1309–1312.

  • Hazra TK, Roy R, Biswas T, Grabowski DT, Pegg AE and Mitra S . 1997 Biochemistry 36: 5769–5776.

  • Horton JK, Roy G, Piper JT, Awasthi CY, Mitra S, Alaoui-Jamali MA, Boldogh I and Singhal SS . 1999 Biochem Pharmacol 58: 693–702.

  • Hu Y, Benedict MA, Wu D, Inohara N and Nunez G . 1998 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 4386–4391.

  • Kamesaki S, Kamesaki H, Jorgensen TJ, Tanizawa A, Pommier Y and Cossman J . 1993 Cancer Res 53: 4251–4256.

  • Kohn KW, Spears CL and Doty P . 1966 J Mol Biol 19: 266–288.

  • Krokan HE, Standal R and Slupphaug G . 1997 Biochemistry 325: 1–16.

  • Kurimasa A, Kumano S, Boubnov NV, Story MD, Tung CS, Peterson SR and Chen DJ . 1999 Mol Cell Biol 19: 3877–3884.

  • Meikrantz W and Schlegel R . 1995 J Cell Biochem 58: 160–174.

  • Mitra S and Kaina B . 1993 Prog Nucl Acids Res Mol Biol 44: 109–141.

  • Mu D, Tursun M, Duckett DR, Drummond JT, Modrich P and Sancar A . 1997 Mol Cell Biol 17: 760–769.

  • Ramana CV, Boldogh I, Izumi T and Mitra S . 1998 Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 5061–5066.

  • Reed JC . 1997 Adv, Pharmacol 41: 501–532.

  • Robertson KA, Hill DP, Xu Y, Liu L, Van Epps S, Hockenberry DM, Park JR, Wilson TM and Kelly MR . 1997 Cell Growth Differ 8: 443–449.

  • Roy R, Biswas T, Hazra TK, Roy G, Grabowski DT, Izumi T, Srinivasan G and Mitra S . 1998 Biochemistry 37: 580–589.

  • Salvioli S, Ardizzoni A, Franceschi C and Cossarizza A . 1997 FEBS Lett 411: 77–82.

  • Stahelin BJ, Marti U, Solioz M, Zimmermann H and Reichen J . 1998 Mol Path 51: 204–208.

  • Tano K, Dunn WC, Daroudi F, Shiota S, Oreston RJ, Natarajan AT and Mitra S . 1997 J Biol Chem 272: 13250–12354.

  • Thornberry NA and Lazebnik Y . 1998 Science 281: 1312–1316.

  • Tsukihara T, Aoyama H, Yamashita E, Tomizaki T, Yamaguchi H, Shinzawa-Itoh K, Nakashima R, Yaono R and Yoshikawa S . 1996 Science 272: 1136–1144.

  • Van der Heiden MG, Chandel NS, Williamson EK, Schumacker PT and Thompson CB . 1997 Cell 91: 627–637.

  • Yang J, Liu X, Bhalla K, Kim CN, Ibrado AM, Cai J, Peng TI, Jones DP and Wang X . 1997 Science 275: 1129–1132.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Drs CB Thompson, S Korsmeyer, K Scanlon, MP Thelen, and D Chen for cell lines, expression plasmids and antibodies, and Ms Trisha Castranio for technical assistance. We thank Dr D Konkel for editing the manuscript and Ms W Smith for expert secretarial assistance. This research was supported by US Public Health Service Grant ES07572, NIEHS Center Grant ES06676, and by a UTMB Sealy Foundation Development Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roy, G., Horton, J., Roy, R. et al. Acquired alkylating drug resistance of a human ovarian carcinoma cell line is unaffected by altered levels of pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins. Oncogene 19, 141–150 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203318

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203318

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links