Abstract
MR. ROBINSON'S letter reveals a misapprehension which might be shared by others, and should at once be removed. The note in question was not an independent report of Dr. Jeans's article. It was a comment on the article, published in the same issue of NATURE, and intended to be read in conjunction therewith. Its purpose was to direct attention to the Supplement and to indicate its general tendency. It was obviously impossible and undesirable to mention all Dr. Jeans's suggestions about life. Those suggestions, indeed, were entirely secondary to the main thesis, which was that “the primary physical process of the universe is the conversion of matter into radiation”. The possible view of life referred to in the note was selected because it threw the main thesis into the strongest relief. The selection carried no implication whatever that the view was the one favoured by Dr. Jeans or by modern scientific thought. As Mr. Robinson says: “readers can turn to the original and judge for themselves”. In case Mr. Robinson imagines that there has been an insidious attempt to propagate materialism in the guise of science, let me say that personally I hold the idealistic view—so strongly, indeed, as to be able to contemplate the alternative with equanimity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dr. Jeans and the ‘Disease’ of Life. Nature 118, 877–878 (1926). https://doi.org/10.1038/118877c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/118877c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.