Abstract
II. DARWIN regarded the appendix as one of man's vestigial structures, and Metchnikoff accepted this verdict without demur, although there were then anatomists, particularly Prof. R. J. Berry,15 who refused to regard the appendix as a useless structure. Every child is born with a fully and well-developed appendix which varies in length round a mean of 35 mm. Ribbert's investigations16 showed that amongst the Swiss the appendix has reached its maximum length, 97 mm., by the twentieth year; thereafter the average length falls slowly, so that by the sixtieth year it has become reduced to 85 mm. Prof. Berry17 found in the population of Edinburgh that the appendix did not attain its full length, 89 mm., until the fortieth year, falling to 83 mm. by the sixtieth year. Drs. Garcia and Salloza18 measured the length of the appendix amongst Philippinos—a people living chiefly on a vegetarian dietary. By the twentieth year the appendix of this people had attained a length of 81 mm.; its maximum length, 96 mm., was not reached until the fiftieth year, while the average length fell to 82 mm. by the seventieth year. An organ which increases in length until the twentieth year, or even until the fiftieth, does not merit the name vestigial.
Article PDF
References
Anat. Anz., 1895, vol. 10, p. 761; Journ. Anal, and Physiol., 1906, vol. 40, p. 247.
Prof. Ribbert, Virchow's Archives, 1893, vol. 132, p. 66.
Prof. R. J. Berry, Anat. Anz., 1895, vol. 10.
Garcia and Salloza, Phillipine Journal of Science, 1921, vol. 18, p. 707. See also Fawcett and Blackford, Journ. Anat. and Physiol., 1900, vol. 34, p. xxi; S. Rutherford Macphail, ibid., 1917, vol. 51, p. 306.
Weinberg, Bull, de la Soc. de Path., 1908, vol. 1, p. 556.
The reader will see later tbat I use this term in a somewhat wider sense—one which includes irregular as well as reduced growth.
I have dealt with the incidence and nature of myopia in the British Journal of Physiological Optics, 1925, vol. 1, p. 369.
Brit. Med. Journ., 1921, vol. 2, p. 8.
NATURE, 1916, vol. 97, p. 554.
Some of the details of this comparison were published in "Five Lectures," issued by the Dental Board of the United Kingdom, 1924.
Dr. E. Mellanby, Brit. Med. Journ., 1912, vol. 1, p. 831; Dr. May Mellanby, ibid., 1924, vol. 2, p. 354.
Johns Hopkins Hospital Bulletin, 1922, vol. 33, p. 202.
I have discussed the "Imperfections of Man's Postural Structures" in the Bri. Med. Journ., 1923, vol. 1, pp. 451, 493, 545, 587, 642, 669.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
KEITH, A. The Nature of Man's Structural Imperfections1. Nature 116, 867–869 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/116867a0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/116867a0