Abstract
I HAVE read with much interest the review which appeared in the issue of NATURE for November 1, headed “Archæology of Stonehenge,” not only as a thoughtful criticism on my recently published work, but also as a valuable up-to-date addition to the literature on the subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
STONE, E. Stonehenge: The supposed Blue Stone Trilithon. Nature 115, 84–85 (1925). https://doi.org/10.1038/115084a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/115084a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.