The Word "Scientist" or its Substitute

Abstract

I DO not think exception can fairly be taken to the adoption into a living language of any word that (1) contributes to convenient expression and (2) violates no rule or custom in etymology. Contemporary speech has this advantage over a dead language as a vehicle of thought, that it can be adapted to changing circumstance, whether that be effected by modifying the meaning of old vocables or by the addition of new ones. The invention of printing did much to arrest colloquial change and to standardise speech, but a useful measure of elasticity still prevails. Examples in point are the verbs “to burke” and “to boycott,” which it would be very inconvenient to discard.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MAXWELL, H. The Word "Scientist" or its Substitute. Nature 115, 50 (1925) doi:10.1038/115050a0

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.