Abstract
IF Prof. E. W. Scripture (NATURE, October 11, p. 534) had said that normal English verse was mainly a matter of rhythm—instead of saying that verse is purely a matter of rhythm—he would have been in line with ordinary opinion to-day. I have myself taught this, at Cambridge and elsewhere, for a quarter of a century. Prof. Scripture contributes nothing new except his method of research and the unnecessary word “centroid.” His conclusion is too sweeping, and at the same time defective. The works of Homer, Pindar, Virgil, Horace, and Ovid are verse; and in them we are obliged to take account of quantitative feet. Shakespeare's blank verse line is rhythmic; Milton's is rhythmic and quantitative as well; both observe the principle of number. One of the great aesthetic principles, that uniformity shall admit of variety, so that we receive a continual satisfaction of expectation, mingled with recurrent surprise, would be thwarted if verse were written solely on Prof. Scripture's principle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LUMMIS, E. The Physical Nature of Verse. Nature 114, 682–683 (1924). https://doi.org/10.1038/114682c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/114682c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.