Biological Terminology

Abstract

MY gentle touch has started an avalanche indeed, but I remain unmoved. Sir Archdall Reid asks (NATURE, June 2, p. 425): “Is not all systematic zoology and botany founded on this kind of classification?”—a classification based on definite, concrete facts of structure, in which there is “little or nothing” based on causes, on antecedents and consequents, or on hypothesis. The answer is in the negative. May I illustrate briefly some kinds of interpretation that a systematist has to employ?

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BATHER, F. Biological Terminology. Nature 107, 489–490 (1921). https://doi.org/10.1038/107489a0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.