Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The British Association

Abstract

IT is important not to confuse two distinct aims: (1) to make the proceedings less specialised, and (2) to make them more popular. I believe that in practice these two aims are often found even to be opposed. The committee of Section A has often arranged joint discussions with other Sections—a typical way of broadening our proceedings—but not in the least with the idea of attracting the public. I think the idea was that, by bringing together a number of experts with different points of view, a discussion would result which would advance science, but would necessarily be rather beyond the comprehension of most of us.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EDDINGTON, A. The British Association. Nature 106, 211–212 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/106211d0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/106211d0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing