Abstract
THE only elements of our society which seem to benefit from the great increase in the wealth of the world through science are those which it will be one of the hardest problems of reconstruction to divert into more productive and honourable means of livelihood. Those who sow the seed and reap the harvest alike, year by year, by their labours seem to be able only to increase their dependence upon private charity and public doles. Universities sow the seed, and their claims, like the claims of the farmer for seed for his future harvest, ought to be absolutely the first charge upon the yearly revenue. It is as idle to say the country cannot afford it as it would be for a farmer to grudge the seed for his next year's crop. It affords a plethora of most expensive evils and unnecessary luxuries. In the spirit of one of the early Methodist preachers, I feel, whenever I see a specially sumptuous motor-car, “There, but for the grace of Parliament, goes a professor of chemistry” and even a humble two-seater might in happier circumstances have become a demonstrator!
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
SODDY, F. University Grants. Nature 106, 8–9 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/106008c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/106008c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.