Abstract
PROF, VAN EVERDINGEN'S outspoken criticism in NATURE of July 22, p. 637, of the meteorological arrangements outlined in Annexe G of the Convention for International Air Navigation is very welcome. Prior to the war the International Meteorological Committee met every three years in friendly gatherings for social intercourse and the transaction of business. Broadly speaking, the difficulties of the members were in obtaining sufficient funds to enable them, in their! respective services, to achieve the ends upon which they were agreed rather than in securing agreement on the desiderata for international exchange. Now that the former difficulties have been largely met as a result of the achievements of meteorology in the war, it would be calamitous if meteorologists failed to overcome the latter, and disturbed the unity of European meteoro-logy at a time when their efforts ought to be directed to achieving unity in world-meteorology.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
GOLD, E. Aerial Navigation and Meteorology. Nature 105, 775–776 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1038/105775a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/105775a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.