Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Usefulness of QT-interval parameters for cardiovascular risk stratification in type 2 diabetic patients with arterial hypertension

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 19, pages 241–249 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

QT-interval parameters are potential indicators of increased cardiovascular risk. We evaluated prospectively their prognostic value, in relation to other risk markers, for cardiovascular fatal and nonfatal events in a cohort of 271 hypertensive type 2 diabetic outpatients. QT intervals were measured from 12-lead standard ECGs obtained on admission and maximum rate-corrected QT-interval duration and QT-interval dispersion (QTd) calculated. Clinical and laboratory data and 2-D echocardiograms (available in 126 patients) were recorded. Survival analyses included Kaplan–Meier survival curves, uni and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. After a median follow-up of 55 months (range 2–84), 68 total fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events and 34 cardiovascular deaths (24 of them from cardiac causes) were observed. In multivariate Cox analysis, QTd was an independent predictor for total cardiovascular events (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01–1.34, for each 10 ms increments) and for cardiac deaths (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.01–1.60). Other independent risk indicators for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality were echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (Echo-LVH), serum triglycerides, presence of pre-existing cardiac and peripheral arterial disease, age, diabetes duration, heart rate and the presence of frequent ventricular premature contractions on ECG. The combination of QTd and Echo-LVH improved cardiovascular risk stratification compared with either alone, the presence of both prolonged QTd (>65 ms) and Echo-LVH was associated with a 3.2-fold (95% CI: 1.7–6.1) increased risk of a first cardiovascular event and a 5.9-fold (95% CI: 2.1–16.4) increased risk of cardiovascular death. Thus, QT provided additive prognostic information for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond that obtained from conventional risk markers, including Echo-LVH, in type 2 diabetic patients with arterial hypertension.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Somberg JC, Molnar J . Usefulness of QT dispersion as an electrocardiographically derived index. Am J Cardiol 2002; 89: 291–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zabel M, Klingenheben T, Franz MR, Hohnloser SH . Assessment of QT dispersion for prediction of mortality or arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. Results of a prospective, long-term, follow-up study. Circulation 1998; 97: 2543–2550.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brendorp B et al. QT dispersion has no prognostic information for patients with advanced congestive heart failure and reduced left ventricular systolic function. Circulation 2001; 103: 831–835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Salles G et al. Prognostic value of QT interval parameters for mortality risk stratification in Chagas'disease: results of a long-term follow-up study. Circulation 2003; 108: 305–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso C, Salles G, Deccache W . Prognostic value of QT interval parameters in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a long-term follow-up prospective study. J Diab Comp 2003; 17: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Bruyne MC et al. Prolonged QT interval predicts cardiac and all-cause mortality in the elderly. The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 278–284.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Malik M, Batchvarov VN . Measurement, interpretation and clinical potential of QT dispersion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1749–1766.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayet J et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and QT dispersion in hypertension. Hypertension 1996; 28: 791–796.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Oikarinen L et al. Relation of QT interval and QT dispersion to echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and geometric pattern in hypertensive patients. The LIFE study. J Hypertens 2001; 19: 1883–1891.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galinier M et al. Prognostic value of ventricular arrhythmias in systemic hypertension. J Hypertens 1997; 15: 1779–1783.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saadeh AM, Jones JV . Predictors of sudden cardiac death in never previously treated patients with essential hypertension: long-term follow-up. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15: 677–680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oikarinen L et al. QRS duration and QT interval predict mortality in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. The losartan intervention for end point reduction in hypertension study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 1029–1034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cardoso CRL, Salles GF, Deccache W . QTc interval prolongation is a predictor of future strokes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Stroke 2003; 34: 2187–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salles GF, Bloch KV, Cardoso CRL . Mortality and predictors of mortality in a cohort of Brazilian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Diab Care 2004; 27: 1299–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schillaci G et al. Continuous relation between left ventricular mass and cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension. Hypertension 2000; 35: 580–586.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cardoso C et al. Clinical determinants of increased QT dispersion in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiol 2001; 79: 253–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salles GF, Cardoso CRL, Deccache W . Multivariate associates of QT interval parameters in diabetic patients with arterial hypertension: importance of left ventricular mass and geometric patterns. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 561–567.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Day CP, McComb JM, Campbell RWF . QT dispersion: an indication of arrhythmia risk in patients with long QT intervals. Br Heart J 1990; 63: 342–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Devereux RB, Reichek N . Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man. Anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Levy D et al. Echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy: The Framingham Heart Study. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 956–960.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenland S, Finkle WD . A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analysis. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 1255–1264.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR . The risk of determining risk in multivariate models. Ann Intern Med 1993; 118: 201–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kors JA, van Herpen G, van Bemmel JH . QT dispersion as an attribute of T-loop morphology. Circulation 1999; 99: 1458–1463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee KW, Kligfield P, Dower GE, Okin . QT dispersion, T wave projection, and heterogeneity of repolarization in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 148–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rana BS et al. Relation of QT-interval dispersion to the number of different cardiac abnormalities in diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 483–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Messerli FH, Grodzicki T . Hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death. Eur Heart J 1992; 13(suppl D): 66–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Curb JD et al. Sudden death, impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes in Japanese American men. Circulation 1995; 91: 2591–2595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Okin PM et al. Combined echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy and electrocardiographic ST depression improve prediction of mortality in American Indians. The Strong Heart Study. Hypertension 2004; 43: 769–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gueyffier F et al. Identification of risk factors in hypertensive patients. Contribution of randomized controlled trials through an individual patient database. Circulation 1999; 100: e88–e94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Florkowski CM, Scott RS, Coope PA, Moir CL . Predictors of mortality from type 2 diabetes mellitus in Canterbury, New Zealand; a ten-year cohort study. Diab Res Clin Prac 2001; 53: 113–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Palatini P, Casiglia E, Julius S, Pessina AC . High heart rate: a risk factor for cardiovascular death in elderly men. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 585–592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Verdecchia P et al. Left ventricular mass and cardiovascular morbidity in essential hypertension: the MAVI Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38: 1829–1835.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB . Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Clement DL et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood-pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 2407–2415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kors JA et al. T axis as an indicator of risk of cardiac events in elderly people. Lancet 1998; 352: 601–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zabel M et al. Analysis of T-wave morphology from the 12-lead electrocardiogram for prediction of long-term prognosis in male US veterans. Circulation 2002; 105: 1066–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Okin PM et al. Electrocardiographic repolarization complexity and abnormality predict all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetes. The Strong Heart Study. Diabetes 2004; 53: 434–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Medical School, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    G F Salles, W Deccache & C R L Cardoso

Authors
  1. G F Salles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W Deccache
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C R L Cardoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G F Salles.

Additional information

Sources of financial support: none.

Potential conflicts of interest: none.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salles, G., Deccache, W. & Cardoso, C. Usefulness of QT-interval parameters for cardiovascular risk stratification in type 2 diabetic patients with arterial hypertension. J Hum Hypertens 19, 241–249 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001815

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jhh.1001815

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links