Abstract
I RECEIVED a few days ago Sir Wm. J. Herschel's brochure, “The Origin of Finger-Printing.” His object–in, addition to examining other claims to this method—is stated to be the desire to place on record the discovery of this method of identification “in Bengal in 1858,” and the author seems to be piously grateful for the “gift granted” to him of that great and most useful discovery. The evidence for this early date is contained in the imprint of a single hand of one Könäi, made at that time. This was issued on a single, sheet some years ago, but when, as an eager student of the subject, I applied to the publishers for a copy, I was told it was issued only for private circulation, and could mot be supplied to me. I now haston at the first opportunity to give my own opinion of this impression, long guarded so carefully from the inspection of the expert critic.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
FAULDS, H. The Permanence of Finger-Print Patterns. Nature 98, 388–389 (1917). https://doi.org/10.1038/098388c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/098388c0
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.