Abstract
I HAVE often been impressed by the scanty attention paid even by original workers in physics to the great principle of similitude. It happens not infrequently that results in the form of “laws” are put forward as novelties on the basis of elaborate experiments, which might have been predicted a priori after a few minutes' consideration. However useful verification may be, whether to solve doubts or to exercise students, this seems to be an inversion of the natural order. One reason for the neglect of the principle may be that, at any rate in its applications to particular cases, it does not much interest mathematicians. On the other hand, engineers, who might make much more use of it than they have done, employ a notation which tends to obscure it. I refer to the manner in which gravity is treated. When the question under consideration depends essentially upon gravity, the symbol of gravity (g) makes no appearance, but when gravity does not enter into the question at all, g obtrudes itself conspicuously.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
RAYLEIGH. The Principle of Similitude . Nature 95, 66–68 (1915). https://doi.org/10.1038/095066c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/095066c0
This article is cited by
-
Getting the (dimensionless) numbers right
Nature Chemical Engineering (2024)
-
The theory of scaling
Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics (2023)
-
Extended finite similitude and dimensional analysis for scaling
Journal of Engineering Mathematics (2023)
-
Dynamic Similitude Analysis for Establishing Scaled-Down Model to Predict Vibration Behaviour of Prestressed Concrete Bridge Girder
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering (2023)
-
Similarity theory and scaling laws for low-temperature plasma discharges: a comprehensive review
Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics (2023)