Letter | Published:

The Names of Fossil Plants

Nature volume 88, page 484 (08 February 1912) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

EVERY botanist musixagree with Dr. Marie Stopes that there should be some ready way to distinguish between the fossil plants which are referred with reasonable assurance to their genera, and those which are merely placed in genera which they seem to resemble, but to which they very probably do not belong. We must also agree that it is unsatisfactory to call every doubtful leaf “Phyllites”, without any serious attempt to indicate its affinities. The use of Gothic type, suggested by Dr. Stopes for the doubtful genera, has some disadvantages, one of them being the inconvenience to the printer. Would it not be simpler to use quotation marks, in the case cited by Dr. Stopes writing Ophioglossum granulatum? The generic name only should be enclosed within commas, as it alone is supposed to be in doubt. The method proposed has the advantage of being already more or less current, and readily understood by any reader.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. University of Colorado, Boulder.

    • T. D. A. COCKERELL

Authors

  1. Search for T. D. A. COCKERELL in:

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/088484e0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.