Abstract
As a reviewer I would point out that I do not desire to uphold any theory, but merely to show what is good and what is bad in the book which I am reviewing, what facts are new, how far these and other facts support any theories, &c. An essay on the duties of a reviewer might be a suitable suggestion to the Editor of NATURE, but obviously I am not the author to present such an article.
Article PDF
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
[Letters to Editor]. Nature 85, 42 (1910). https://doi.org/10.1038/085042a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/085042a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.