Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Coronary heart disease risk in men and the epidemic of overweight and obesity

International Journal of Obesity volume 29, pages 317–323 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the contributions of socioeconomic, lifestyle, and body weight factors to predicted risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the population and thus provide a focus for policies on prevention.

DESIGN:

Prospective study and cross-sectional population health survey.

SUBJECTS:

In all, 3090 men in the Framingham study and 2571 men in the 1998 Health Survey for England (HSE) aged 35–74 y with no history of cardiovascular disease participated in the study.

MEASUREMENTS:

Data on sex, age, systolic blood pressure and antihypertensive medication, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, diabetes, and their association with the incidence of myocardial infarction and fatal CHD in the Framingham study population were used to derive functions for predicting individual 10-y risk of CHD. These functions were applied to the same data on participants in the HSE. High risk was defined as 10-y CHD risk ≥15%. The proportion of high risk in the English population attributable to each of the risk factors examined was assessed.

RESULTS:

In all, 32% of men in England had predicted 10-y CHD risk ≥15%. Such high risk was significantly associated with body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), waist:hip ratio (WHR), smoking, and levels of physical activity, educational attainment, and income (all P≤0.007). In this population, 47% of high CHD risk was attributable to excess body weight—BMI ≥25 kg/m2 and/or WHR ≥0.95—and 31% to the sum of the four other significant factors: lack of educational qualifications, low income, smoking, and physical inactivity.

CONCLUSION:

Overweight and obesity now dominate the standard risk factors of CHD in men and should be the focus of national policies for prevention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease. Department of Health: London; 2000.

  2. Nanchahal K, Duncan JR, Durrington PN, Jackson RT . Analysis of predicted coronary heart disease risk in England based on Framingham study risk appraisal models published in 1991 and 2000. BMJ 2002; 325: 194–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kunst AE, Groenhof F, Mackenbach JP, Health EW . Occupational class and cause specific mortality in middle aged men in 11 European countries: comparison of population based studies. EU Working Group on Scioeconomic Inequalities in Health. BMJ 1998; 316: 1636–1642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kilander L, Berglund L, Boberg M, Vessby B, Lithell H . Education, lifestyle factors and mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer. A 25-year follow-up of Swedish 50-year-old men. Int J Epidemiol 2001; 30: 1119–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Davey Smith G, Neaton JD, Wentworth D, Stamler R, Stamler J . Mortality differences between black and white men in the USA: contribution of income and other risk factors among men screened for the MRFIT. MRFIT Research Group. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Lancet 1998; 351: 934–939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Doll R, Peto R, Wheatly K, Gray R, Sutherland I . Mortality in relation to smoking: 40 years’ observations on male British doctors. BMJ 1994; 309: 901–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu FB, Willett WC . Optimal diets for prevention of coronary heart disease. JAMA 2002; 288: 2569–2578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris JN . Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today's best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 807–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jousilahti P, Tuomilehto J, Vartiainen E, Pekkanen J, Puska P . Body weight, cardiovascular risk factors and coronary mortality. 15-year follow-up of middle-aged men and women in eastern Finland. Circulation 1996; 93: 1372–1379.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on coronary prevention. Eur Heart J 1998; 19: 1434–1503.

  11. Grundy SM, Paternak R, Greenland P, Smith Jr S, Fuster V . Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. Circulation 1999; 100: 1481–1492.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Odell PM, Kannel WB . An updated coronary risk profile: a statement for health professionals. Circulation 1991; 83: 356–362.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Erens B, Primatesta P (eds). Health Survey for England: Cardiovascular Disease. Volume 1: Findings. Volume 2: Methodology and Documentation. HMSO: London; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenland S, Drescher K . Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models. Biometrics 1993; 49: 865–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. D’Agostino Sr RB, Grundy S, Sullivan LM, Wilson P . CHD Risk Prediction Group. Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation. JAMA 2001; 286: 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haq IU, Ramsay LE, Yeo WW, Jackson PR, Wallis EJ . Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations. A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men. Heart 1999; 81: 40–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brindle P, Emberson J, Lampe F, Walker M, Whincup P, Fahey T, Ebrahim S . Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327: 1267–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. Obesity, preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO Consultancy on Obesity. WHO: Geneva; 1997.

  19. Molarius A, Seidell JC . Selection of anthropometric indicators for classification of abdominal fatness—a critical review. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22: 719–727.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lakka HM, Lakka TA, Tuomilehto J, Salonen JT . Abdominal obesity is associated with increased risk of acute coronary events in men. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 706–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB . Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162: 1867–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katzmarzyk PT, Ardern CI . Overweight and obesity mortality trends in Canada, 1985–2000. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 16–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and North American Association for the Study of Obesity. The Practical Guide to the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults, Bethesda, MD, NIH publication no. 00-4084; 2000 (also available from http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/obesity/practgde.htm ).

  24. Anderson JW, Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL . Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74: 579–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dyer AR, Stamler J, Garside D, Greenland P . Long-term consequences of body mass index for cardiovascular mortality: The Chicago heart association detection project in industry. Ann Epidemiol 2004; 14: 101–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Unal B, Critchley JA, Capewell S . Explaining the decline in coronary heart disease mortality in England and Wales between 1981 and 2000. Circulation 2004; 109: 1101–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partly supported by NIH N-01-38038, NIH R01-HL-073272, and a grant from the Donald W Reynolds Foundation Programme in Clinical Cardiovascular Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Public & Environmental Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK

    K Nanchahal & J N Morris

  2. Departments of Biostatistics, Mathematics & Statistics, Boston University, USA

    L M Sullivan

  3. Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Medical Genetics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA

    P W F Wilson

Authors
  1. K Nanchahal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J N Morris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L M Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P W F Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Nanchahal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nanchahal, K., Morris, J., Sullivan, L. et al. Coronary heart disease risk in men and the epidemic of overweight and obesity. Int J Obes 29, 317–323 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802877

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802877

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links