# One Vote, One Value

## Abstract

A CERTAIN class of problems do not as yet appear to be solved according to scientific rules, though they are of much importance and of frequent recurrence. Two examples will suffice. (1) A jury has to assess damages. 2) The council of a society has to fix on a sum of money, suitable for some particular purpose. Each voter, whether of the jury or of the council, has equal authority with each of his colleagues. How can the right conclusion be reached, considering that there may be as many different estimates as there are members? That conclusion is clearly not the average of all the estimates, which would give a voting power to “cranks” in proportion to their crankiness. One absurdly large or small estimate would leave a greater impress on the result than one of reasonable amount, and the more an estimate diverges from the bulk of the rest, the more influence would it exert. I wish to point out that the estimate to which least objection can be raised is the middlemost estimate, the number of votes that it is too high being exactly balanced by the number of votes that it is too low. Every other estimate is condemned by a majority of voters as being either too high or too low, the middlemost alone escaping this condemnation. The number of voters may be odd or even. If odd, there is one middlemost value; thus in 11 votes the middlemost is the 6th; in 99 votes the middlemost is the 50th. If the number of voters be even, there are two middlemost values, the mean of which must be taken; thus in 12 votes the middlemost lies between the 6th and the 7th; in 100 votes between the 50th and the 51st. Generally, in 2n—1 votes the middlemost is the nth; in 2n votes it lies between the nth and the (n + 1)th.

## Access options

Rent or Buy article

from\$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

GALTON, F. One Vote, One Value. Nature 75, 414 (1907). https://doi.org/10.1038/075414a0

• Issue Date:

• ### Healthcare Rationing Cutoffs and Sorites Indeterminacy

• Philip M Rosoff

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (2019)

• ### Valuing Health: Evolution, Revolution, Resistance, and Reform

• Charles E. Phelps

Value in Health (2019)

• ### A New Method to Determine the Optimal Willingness to Pay in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

• Charles E. Phelps

Value in Health (2019)

• ### Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds

• Joaquin Navajas
• , Tamara Niella
• , Gerry Garbulsky
• , Bahador Bahrami
•  & Mariano Sigman

Nature Human Behaviour (2018)

• ### Microscopic modeling and analysis of collective decision making: equality bias leads suboptimal solutions

• Pierluigi Vellucci
•  & Mattia Zanella

ANNALI DELL'UNIVERSITA' DI FERRARA (2018)