Abstract
MR. WILBERFORCE'S letter (NATURE p. 462) raises some points I ought to notice. In treating of the stress and strain, my phraseology has, I think, been extremely “unmaterialistic,” in the sense that I have said little or nothing about a magnetic “ether,” and have employed rather the language of action at a distance. Maxwell doubtless would have put things very differently, but my own experience has been that when one wishes to avoid confusing ordinary people on such questions as the sign of a stress or strain, the less one says about “ether” the better. My discussion of Maxwell's electrostatic medium (Proceedings Edinburgh Math. Soc, vol. xi. p. 107) will show, I hope, that his standpoint is not unfamiliar to me. The question really at issue is the existence and sign of certain strains in iron and other gross materials, and I judged Prof. Ewing's mode of presenting the case, which I practically followed, to be as clear as any. If strict Maxwellians object to the association of his name—which I did not originate—with stresses answering to the strains in question, by all means let us use another term, say “Q stresses,” so long as their existence is queried.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
CHREE, C. The Stress in Magnetised Iron. Nature 53, 533–534 (1896). https://doi.org/10.1038/053533c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/053533c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.