Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A Review Reviewed

Abstract

I WILL reply seriatim to the various points of Prof. Tarr's letter. (1) Term “Mineraliser.”—I still think the word objectionable in the sense used by Prof. Tarr. To most people it probably conveys the idea of something which converts or helps to convert another substance into a mineral. How can sulphur be said to “mineralise” silver by combining with it? Both the elements already exist as minerals in nature; and one might just as well say that the silver mineralised the sulphur.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

A Review Reviewed. Nature 50, 268–269 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/050268c0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/050268c0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing