Abstract
I WILL reply seriatim to the various points of Prof. Tarr's letter. (1) Term “Mineraliser.”—I still think the word objectionable in the sense used by Prof. Tarr. To most people it probably conveys the idea of something which converts or helps to convert another substance into a mineral. How can sulphur be said to “mineralise” silver by combining with it? Both the elements already exist as minerals in nature; and one might just as well say that the silver mineralised the sulphur.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
A Review Reviewed. Nature 50, 268–269 (1894). https://doi.org/10.1038/050268c0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/050268c0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.