Letter | Published:

“The Zoological Record”

Nature volume 49, page 198 | Download Citation



WE are delighted to find such a consensus of opinion as to the desirability of retaining palæozoology in the Zoological Record. The recorders whom we have consulted, the editor, and now the secretary of the Zoological Society, all have expressed themselves in its favour. The question therefore is purely one of finance. Under these circumstances the publication of the correspondence with the Geological Society is of great interest, and the only addition that we could suggest would be the publication in your columns of that poverty-stricken society's balance-sheet.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Author information


  1. December 17.

    • R. I. POCOCK
    •  & F. A. BATHER


  1. Search for R. I. POCOCK in:

  2. Search for F. A. BATHER in:

About this article

Publication history





By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.