Abstract
I HAVE been much interested in the letter of “Kanhaiyalal,” which appears in your issue of August 31. I fully agree with him in the view taken in regard to the verification of dates by astronomical methods, and it really does seem somewhat singular that the example of Sir William Jones, the pioneer of Orientalism in Europe, should have been entirely neglected by his learned colleagues and successors in this department of research. From many considerations it must be obvious that wherever mention of planetary “yogams” or conjunctions, siderial and lunar positions, &c., are given in the text of any classical work, they are to be preferred to any arguments drawn merely from literary style and other empirical data—so much relied upon by Orientalists and scholars generally—when the question is one of a calendaric date.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
OLD, W. The Nativity of Rama. Nature 49, 4–5 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1038/049004b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/049004b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.