Abstract
ALTHOUGH my friend Prof. Lankester finds that the “tendency of the development” of the Royal Society has been to restrict the area from which its members are selected—a conclusion in which I am not disposed to agree—I do not find that he seriously impugns the account which I attempted to give of what appeared to me to be the traditional practice of the Society in the matter.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
THISELTON-DYER, W. The Royal Society. Nature 48, 247 (1893). https://doi.org/10.1038/048247b0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/048247b0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.