Abstract
MR. POULTON says it is to be regretted that I have not written anything which can be considered as a reply to his previous letter. But this is exactly what I did. In that letter he merely made the bald statement that I had not acquainted myself with the views of Prof. Weismann, which I had “professed to express.” This statement I denied, and what further “reply” it admits of I must leave Mr. Poulton to explain.
Article PDF
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ROMANES, G. Lamarckism versus Darwinism. Nature 38, 413 (1888). https://doi.org/10.1038/038413a0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/038413a0
This article is cited by
-
The genotype–phenotype distinction: from Mendelian genetics to 21st century biology
Genetica (2022)
-
Eclipsing the Eclipse?: A Neo-Darwinian Historiography Revisited
Journal of the History of Biology (2021)
-
Between Social and Biological Heredity: Cope and Baldwin on Evolution, Inheritance, and Mind
Journal of the History of Biology (2019)
-
Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation
Biology & Philosophy (2007)
-
The expanded evolutionary synthesis—a response to Godfrey-Smith, Haig, and West-Eberhard
Biology & Philosophy (2007)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.